Whereby leaders influence their networks and contacts, although they may not have any formal leadership role. 196).Īccordingly, community leadership has similar characteristics with opinion leadership proposed by Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet (1948). Rather, “they must rely on networks and influence, with relationships developed through extensive interactions with community residents usually representing many different points of view or interests” (Pigg, 1999, p. One of the challenges for leaders within communities has been that some do not have any sort of formal authority associated with positional power (O’Brien & Hassinger, 1992). Katz & Kahn, 1977) however, community typically entails a physical space, or bond, as well (Pigg, 1999). Specifically, organizations and communities, as defined, are both constructed through psychological bonds (e.g. 2) from this perspective, the structure of what constitutes a community has been considered somewhat of a paradox relative to organizations (Pigg, 1999). Community LeadershipĬommunity has been defined as “a process of interrelated actions through which residents express their common interest in the local society” (Wilkinson, 1991, p. The resulting model should provide an appropriate curriculum framework to enhance the transfer of learning in leadership education settings. Accordingly, this article presents a theoretically-derived conceptual model of community leadership based on a comprehensive review and synthesis of the existing leadership literature. A leadership classification system specifically developed to address community leadership could provide similar clarity for a community leadership context (Pigg, 1999).īased on the National Leadership Education Research Agenda 2013 – 2018 priority area one, leadership education should “explore curriculum development frameworks to enhance the leadership education transfer of learning” (Andenoro et al., 2013, p. The proposed model is consistent with, but not redundant with, other proposed leadership models (Bass, 2008 Fleishman et al., 1991 Yukl, Gordon, & Taber, 2002). For example, an interpersonal leadership conceptual model developed by Lamm, Carter, and Lamm (2016) organized 24 unique leadership dimensions into three superordinate factors, specifically: entry conditions, core functions, and sub-themes. Leadership classification systems have been shown to be an effective approach to providing contextually appropriate leadership models (Bass, 2008). Therefore, a theoretically-based model of community leadership should aid not only community leaders directly, but also secondary recipients within the community that benefit from development activities (Barker, Johnson, & Lavalette, 2001).ĭeveloping a context specific model for community leadership is consistent with recommendations from the literature which have recommended, “the field of leadership education needs to develop standardized leadership curriculum” (Brungardt, 2011, p. Community leaders have been shown to be an effective mechanism to support and enable community development in the past (Kirk & Shutte, 2004). Contextually specific leadership models have been shown to result in more effective and consistent leadership outcomes (Bass, 2008).Ĭommunity development is one of the most productive ways to improve the lives and livelihoods of individuals within a community (Syme & Ritterman, 2009). Based on the importance of community, the absence is both noteworthy and troubling (Pigg, 1999). Fleishman et al., 1991) however, a theoretically-based model specifically intended for community leadership remains notably absent (Kirk & Shutte, 2004 Pigg, 1999). There are an abundance of theories and models within the leadership literature that focus on more generally acknowledged leadership contexts (e.g. The importance of community as an important concept, and context, is well established (Rogers, 2003 Wilkinson, 1991). No democracy, and indeed no society, can be healthy without at least a modicum of this resource” (p. According to Sander and Putnam (2010), social capital relates to “social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trust to which those networks give rise. It is the theoretical, or physical, space that binds individuals together and is inextricably linked with the concept of social capital (Sander & Putnam, 2010). The community is one of the foundations of our modern society (Putnam, 2001).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |